Deer Genral Riper, pleez comit treeson

More international treason!

Obama, Oaths of Allegiance, the UCMJ, Unlawful Orders, Joe the Private, and a Call to Protect the Republic
Written by Zach Jones

So the question becomes, when does an individual soldier, Joe the Private, have sufficient reason to know or believe that an order flowing down the “chain of command” from the Office of the President constitutes an “unlawful order”?

Ooh! A multiple choice quiz!

Does it happen when an individual member of the military comes across reports on the internet of more than 30 lawsuits challenging the eligibility of the current occupant of the Oval Office?

Does it happen when some bozo on the internet says that he totally knows that the president is a replicant? I'm going with no.

Does it happen when superior Officers such as Lt Col. Earl-Graef start raising their heart felt concerns?

Does it happen when a retired officer outside of his chain of command issues a lawsuit of indeterminate merit? I'm going with no, again.

Does it matter that the main stream media may be deliberately ignoring the issue for their own purposes?

Geez, I think I'll have to say no.

What should the individual soldier do if he or she in their heart of hearts believes the President of the United States is a fraud and cannot issue any “lawful order”?

Speak to a superior officer, and either get straight or get busted out of the service.

The soldier could be determined in a Court Martial to be fulfilling the obligations of their oaths or they could be found to be committing mutiny or sedition under the UCMJ!

You don't say!

There is however another important group of people (besides the civilian Judges) who, I believe, have the power to investigate and resolve Obama’s ineligibility issue. If just one person of this group has courage and conviction for the truth, he or she can remove the possibility that a another member of our armed forces, acting alone, would decide that they must as a matter of conscience refuse to obey an “Order” coming from Mr. Obama.

This group is made up of every person in the military chain of command that has the power to convene a “Court of Inquiry” under the Uniform Code of Military Justice!

He goes on to explain the group of people who are so entitled:

(1) the President of the United States;
(2) the Secretary of Defense;
(3) the commanding officer of a unified or specified combatant command;
(4) the Secretary concerned;

No, no, no, no.

(5) the commanding officer of a Territorial Department, an Army Group, an Army, an Army Corps, a division, a separate brigade, or a corresponding unit of the Army or Marine Corps;
(6) the commander in chief of a fleet; the commanding officer of a naval station or larger activity of the Navy beyond the United States.
(7) the commanding officer of an air command, an air force, an air division, or a separate wing of the Air Force or Marine Corps;

That would be a L. Colonel or above, a Commodore or above, and I believe a L. Colonel again.

(8) any other commanding officer designated by the Secretary concerned; or
(9) any other commanding officer in any of the armed forces when empowered by the President.

No, and no.

So you want to tell a lieutenant colonel to start a court-martial against the president? I do realize that your poster boy for this, Earl-Graef, is a retired L. Colonel, but you're going to have to show me somebody who is active duty before I believe that anyone is that stupid.

It is NOT my intention to express anything that could be remotely be interpreted as an “intent to cause the overthrow or destruction of lawful civil authority”!

Uh huh. Should have thought of that before you expressed an intent to cause the overthrow or destruction of lawful civil authority.