Call for nuts

I'm looking for more treasonous nuts because I'm fairly scared of what may be going on here. If you have any leads, post them in the comments here.

I'm not looking for lawsuits--specifically, I'm looking for anything where people are telling other people not to obey laws, regulations, and executive orders signed by Obama or to refuse to comply with military orders coming from Obama.

This might just be a couple nuts, but it's also possible that these people might just get active enough to cause some civil unrest, and I think that keeping tabs on them might be a good idea.

I can't promise to post about this all the time, but it does capture my attention.

Lighter blogging.

Just an FYI--

The crazies are either getting less crazy or learning to keep quiet about treasonous tendencies, so I'm probably going to be blogging less here in the coming months.

I still have a few posts that alert readers sent in that I plan to write about Real Soon Now, so don't worry. I haven't forgotten about it.

Letter to the Rain God

So this isn't too much treason, but I have to.

Letter to the Attorney General of the State of Washington

Mr. Robert McKenna ,
Attorney General,
Washington Office of The Attorney General
1125 Washington St, SE
PO Box 40100
Olympia, WA 98504-0100



I always loved this AG. Those of you who haven't finished the Hitch-Hiker's Guide to the Galaxy trilogy won't get it.

And yeah, treason:

Mr. Neuenschwander believes, that should he be recalled, along with current active/inactive/ retired members of the Armed Forces of the United States, are currently carrying and in the future out the orders of The President of the United States under duress

Hey, look! Keyes v Bowen is gutted!

You wouldn't know that from Orly:

In regards to Alan Keyes, again, it was not heard on the merits yet.

Let's see...

SECRETARY OF STATE DEBRA BOWEN'S DEMURRER TO FIRST AMENDED PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDATE
[...]
The Court is not persuaded that petitioners will be able to amend their First Amended Petition to state a cause of action against the Secretary of State. Therefore, the demurrer is SUSTAINED WITHOUT LEAVE TO AMEND.
[...]
DEMURRER OF PRESIDENT BARACK OBAMA, VICE PRESIDENT JOE BIDEN, AND CALIFORNIA ELECTORS TO PETITIONERS' FIRST AMENDED PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDATE
[...]
The Court is not persuaded that petitioners will be able to amend their First Amended Petition to state a
cause of action against President Barack Obama, Vice President Joe Biden, or the named California
Electors. Therefore, the demurrer is SUSTAINED WITHOUT LEAVE TO AMEND.
[...]
MOTION TO QUASH OF PRESIDENT BARACK OBAMA, VICE PRESIDENT JOE BIDEN, AND 55 CALIFORNIA ELECTORS OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, FOR AN ORDER THAT THE DEPOSITION OF THE CUSTODIAN OF RECORDS OF OCCIDENTAL COLLEGE NOT BE TAKEN.
[...]
The motion to quash the subpoena is GRANTED.

It's not dismissed due to standing. It's gutted due to mooted due to the fact that the election is over, the fact that there's no legal recourse available, and the fact that Bowen did her job, regardless of what the facts are. So, er.

Treason, though. It's a blog about treason. Let's see...

If he doesn't produce, he needs to be removed from office immediately

That'll do.

While I'm on the subject:

Dear Senator Kyle

Is that Kyle Reese from the Terminator series? Awe. Some.

Or is that Senator John Kyl, who does not have an e in his name? Significantly less awesome.

It is your duty to subpoena all of Obama's vital records, and if he cannot prove Natural born status, remove him from office ASAP. It will not be an impeachment

I love the smell of extra-constitutional actions in the...I guess it's evening.

OK. Let's go over unlawful orders again

Knoxville (Tennessee) News Reports on Birth Certificate Issue

Every such person swears to support and defend the Constitution and to obey the commander-in-chief. But, if that commander occupies the position illegally, then those personnel have an affirmative duty (under the Uniform Code of Military Justice) to disobey any order given by an unlawful authority.

No, they don't. They have a negative duty not to obey an unlawful order, regardless of its authority.

Let's go back to the Manual for Courts-Martial. 14.c(2)(a) reads, in part:

(i) Inference of lawfulness. An order requiring the performance of a military duty or act may be inferred to be lawful and it is disobeyed at the peril of the subordinate. This inference does not apply to a patently illegal order, such as one that directs the commission of a crime.
(ii) Determination of lawfulness. The lawfulness of an order is a question of law to be determined by the military judge.
(iii) Authority of issuing officer. The commissioned officer issuing the order must have authority to give such an order. Authorization may be based on law, regulation, or custom of the service.

Illegal orders are orders issued by the proper authority that compel the soldier to commit an illegal act. George W. Bush could give illegal orders under his authority as president. So could Barack Obama. I, however, cannot issue an illegal order unless I become president or join the military. In any case, unless your orders come directly from the president (in which case, your rank is either General or Colonel in the Army--not sure about other branches of the military), the officer issuing the order is not Barack Obama.

As for the negative/affirmative stuff, it's pretty simple: If your CO orders you to guard a water pump and shoot any civilian who tries to drink from it, that's pretty obviously illegal. You do not have to shoot those civilians. But if you see the enemy trying to drink from the pump, you do not have the obligation not to shoot her.

So good luck trying to get someone to believe your interpretation of the UCMJ.

To my knowledge, it hasn't happened ... yet.

Although Obama recently increased our troop strength in Afghanistan, he has not yet attempted to start any new war.

Hasn't attempted to start a new war...yet. Is Obama like a foreign-food diner? "I'm in the mood for a Thai war tonight. I've got my leftover Côte d'Ivoire war in the fridge, so maybe I'll have that war tomorrow."

If he does, and if soldiers disobey, the Manual for Courts-Martial is on their side. (As a former Air Force law-enforcement supervisor, and leader of counter-terrorist teams, I am familiar with the UCMJ provisions and the MCM procedures.) One cannot be punished for disobeying an order if the order was unlawful.

There are two possibilities. Either you're not a former AF supervisor, or you need to brush up on the MCM. It is most definitely not on your side.

Uh...

Doc Orly is (predictably) not making sense:

Sarah Novascone, the 14th Amendent has absolutely nothing to do with the definition of Natural Born Citizen.

Uh...

All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside.

Sarah Novascone, Natural Born Citizen and Citizen have two different definitions.

Most people remember this amendment from Civics class as "That amendment that allowed black people to be citizens." So if you're saying that it has only something to do with citizenship, but not natural-born citizenship, that's tantamount to saying that the 14th amendment did not change the ability of black people to be natural-born citizens.

Which would mean that you don't believe that black people can be president.

Now, I'm not sure if that's what you meant to say. For one thing, you're pretty incoherent. But even if it isn't, you're wrong and stating that makes you look like a racist.

Just sayin'.

Oh, perfect timing!

New Oath Keepers Blog

Have you take an oath to defend the Constitution and will NOT follow the orders of a Usurper?

Oh, Lord. Let's take a look at the site.

http://www.oath-keepers.blogspot.com

1. We will NOT obey any order to disarm the American people.
2. We will NOT obey any order to conduct warrantless searches of the American people, their homes, vehicles, papers, or effects - such as warrantless house-to house searches for weapons or persons.
3. We will NOT obey any order to detain American citizens as “unlawful enemy combatants” or to subject them to trial by military tribunal.
4. We will NOT obey orders to impose martial law or a “state of emergency” on a state, or to enter with force into a state, without the express consent and invitation of that state’s legislature and governor.
5. We will NOT obey orders to invade and subjugate any state that asserts its sovereignty and declares the national government to be in violation of the compact by which that state entered the Union.
6. We will NOT obey any order to blockade American cities, thus turning them into giant concentration camps.
7. We will NOT obey any order to force American citizens into any form of detention camps under any pretext.
8. We will NOT obey orders to assist or support the use of any foreign troops on U.S. soil against the American people to “keep the peace” or to “maintain control” during any emergency, or under any other pretext. We will consider such use of foreign troops against our people to be an invasion and an act of war. 8. We will NOT obey orders to assist or support the use of any foreign troops on U.S. soil against the American people to “keep the peace” or to “maintain control” during any emergency, or under any other pretext. We will consider such use of foreign troops against our people to be an invasion and an act of war.
9. We will NOT obey any orders to confiscate the property of the American people, including food and other essential supplies, under any emergency pretext whatsoever.

Huh. While it's a little startling that these people feel the need to say these things, I'm not seeing any mention of Obama. So, uh, I think that's a swing and a miss for Doc Orly.

Sorry for the delay

I'm sorry about the non-posting.

I just got a new job (it was quite sudden). Well, it's just sort of a trial period now, but it may be a real new job. So that's been keeping me busy. Back soon, but I'll leave you with this:



Apparently, the person who created this is not aware of all internet traditions.

Also, apparently this person is not aware of any design traditions, or even that we didn't have two parties in this country until 1841, and after that, there were two other extended periods of one-party rule: after the Civil War and after the Great Depression.

Also: we were living under Communism from 2001-2007. Who knew? This person, evidently.

Can it be? Donofrio makes sense?

Leo Donofrio is making some sense. I still think he's an idiot and probably hallucinating, but he seems to know that sticking your hand in a rat trap is a Bad Thing. Doc Orly doesn't seem to get that and will probably send Donofrio to the outer darkness, where there will be wailing and gnashing of teeth.

I originally thought that this was going away after the inauguration, but I forgot the When Prophecy Fails scenario. Judging from that and other similar cults, once Easterling gets court-martialed, Donofrio will be attacked as an agent of the enemy.

Military POTUS Eligibility Madness

A few weeks ago, I suggested hypothetically that active military might have standing to bring a class action to question Obama’s POTUS eligibility. After reviewing various sections of the Uniform Code of Military Justice pointed out to me by various readers, I came to the conclusion that such a law suit would probably not only fail, but would also subject soldiers to potential court martial.

I decided to have nothing to do with any such law suit involving military plaintiffs. Their burden is already so large. This is our burden.

Then, after seeing a consent form issued by Orly Taitz within which active military were being asked to state that they might disobey orders from President Obama, I realized that these men were truly being put in serious jeopardy. I responded with a blog which suggested that any soldiers who had a problem with Obama’s eligibility should consult a JAG lawyer or their personal attorney rather than going to the internet for advice.

I hoped the issue would go away, but it didn’t. This week an active military officer signed a consent form to be a plaintiff in a future law suit brought by Orly Taitz. Besides erroneously reporting that the officer had defied a Presidential order, the officer’s name was released and inflammatory and contemptuous statements were also released via World Net Daily, Orly’’s blog and the Drudge Report.

I complained vehemently and eventually the incorrect headline which grossly and erroeneously stated that the officer had defied a Presidential order was changed at all three sources.

Unfortunately, the damage had already been done. Review the following statement by the officer:

“Until Mr. Obama releases a ‘vault copy’ of his original birth certificate for public review, I will consider him neither my Commander in Chief nor my President, but rather, a usurper to the Office – an impostor…”

This statement should never have been made public. If Orly Taitz is going to solicit active military to join her potential law suit and sign consent forms thereto, then she should be charged with the responsibility of knowing the exact punishment her clients will be subjected to, and she should be protecting them from any unnecessary jeopardy.

The Easterling thing is exploding nicely

Military.com - Officer Calls Obama 'Usurper' President

"We are taking a look at that ourselves right now," Lt. Col. Christopher Garver said. "We are always trying to balance our ... military requirements under the Uniform Code of Military Justice versus critical freedoms that all Americans enjoy."

Welp, looks like Lt. Easterling will probably enjoy a nice dishonorable discharge.

While I'm here, I'd like to note Doc Orly's response:

Open Letter Response to the Lt. Easerling (sic) story covered by Bryant Jordan of Military.com

Can't even get her own client's name right. I'm sure there's a metaphor or something in there.

1. In a letter you questioned the very existence of officer Easterling and Mr. Tulley stated that information was given by a third party with an ax to grind. As a reporter you could check Officer Easterling's existence, instead of questioning that. Mr. Tulley claimed that I am a party with an ax to grind. Based on what? His imagination. That is a defamatory statement and I expect retraction and apology.

If there were one way to describe Orly, axe to grind would not be it. Obviously biased would be the phrase I prefer.

Also, for those of you looking for point #2, there is no point #2. Point #3 is, presumably, No Pooftahs.

As far as the last comment goes, about Chief of staff saluting Obama, I don't know if I should respond seriously or laugh. In Germany chief of staff saluted Hitler, didn't make him legitimate. In our recent history chief of staff saluted Nixon, as he was getting into helicopter and leaving office disgraced during Watergate.

Doc Orly apparently missed a few days in history class. See, while Nixon did use dirty tricks to get validly elected, Hitler was actually validly elected without any dirty tricks (well, unless you want to count Dolchstoßlegende, in which case, it was the fault of the voters for not thinking critically). In both cases, the election was valid and they were president and chancellor, respectively. Which was the point that the original author made.

I don't think that's proper address

Dr. Taitz's Military Action Welcomes' Officer Easterling

You don't address military officers as "officer." You use whatever rank that particular officer is. Otherwise, you can't tell a lowly second or first lieutenant from a colonel or a general. I wonder what rank he is...

I was promoted to 1LT on Feb. 2, 2009

Ah! First Lieutenant. An O-2 pay grade, the second lowest in the officer corps (which he joined straight out of basic training in this case).

Wake me up when you have a captain. I probably won't pay any attention then, either, but at least you won't be embarrassing yourself.

You say you want a revolution...

Tea Party revolution brewing

The kettle’s whistling. Tea Parties are popping up all over the country. People are flocking to these sites which have cropped up practically overnight in search of information about rallies, demonstrations and Tea Parties in their cities. The revolution is brewing!

You know, for self-proclaimed patriots, these people seem positively giddy at the thought of personally killing their fellow countrymen (and women).

Screwing for chastity

What will YOU do when “they” come for your neighbor???

So someone puts up a sign saying that Obama is a traitor and someone should make a citizen's arrest. Given that the person in question does not live in North Carolina, the only state to allow citizens' arrests, I can see how someone might get the wrong idea and why they might send for the Secret Service, though I think that's taking things way too far.

And then, hang on a tick...

THIS is exactly why we need to organize on a local level first!

Oh.

RESISTERS

Ah.

Are you going to RESIST or are you going to sit at your computer writing letters that are ignored, or planning for your ‘big protest’ several months from now??

Uh, well maybe she only means...

What WILL you do WHEN they come for your neighbor?? What will you want your neighbor to do when they come FOR YOU??

Uh... nevermind.

Yes, Yes This Is Cause For Alarm Is Cause For Alarm

Yes This Is Cause For Alarm

Greg on his blog justly pointed at the need to restore the Militia of the several States as if we are to restore, defend and uphold the Constitution, and thereby the Constitutional Republic, against current conspiracy of usurpation and tyranny from within it is essential we work on State and Country level.

Yeah, that sounds an awful lot like treason.

It's that time again!

Hey! Did you hear about the bill that some guy introduced to repeal the 22nd Amendment? Interestingly, the author of the article appears to have at least one brain cell, because he notes that the same people introduce the same bill every for Congress, since Reagan.

(Ditto the bill to reintroduce the draft. I wouldn't be surprised to learn of a perennial bill to reintroduce Prohibition.)

The angriest dog in the world

[Someone here said they liked the Fire Joe Morgan style of analysis I did. I like that too, so I'm doing this, even though it's not strictly treason. I started this as a way to deal with the crap I see from the birthers, and I think this still falls under that category. I don't even know who Joe Morgan is. I stole this style from Sadly, No!, who do have Fire Joe Morgan on their blogroll. --Ed.]

Rob Lamb wrote an Open letter to Eric (beeping) Holder
Posted on February 20th, 2009 by David-Crockett

I know what you're thinking. (bleeping) means fucking, right? In fact, careful analysis suggests that the term is not fucking. I'll leave you to figure out what it is.

Coward? You say that I am a coward? SCREW YOU.

Aww, how cute! Ron Lamb shows that the biggest words can come from the littlest penis of all.

Years ago, while one day opening my business, I was robbed at gunpoint by four BLACK men of thousands of dollars, and I was shot in the chest.

Apparently, he was robbed by very stupid criminals, who rob a store in the morning, i.e. when the store has no money. A store that has thousands of dollars in the morning isn't necessarily raking in the dough, but if you need more than $2000 in the morning, you'll probably have at least ten large by noon. I used to work as a cashier for a news stand, and each day, I started with $250 in the drawer. For an eight hour shift, I'd usually make a drop of no less than $500 once a shift--often I'd have them drop $1000 or more. At three registers and more in the safe in the back, we probably started each day with $1000 and left each day with $10,000--probably closer to $20,000 since we did Western Union and that money didn't go into out till.

Unless, of course, they were four crazed junkies who needed money for their next fix and were willing to stake out this guy's store and wait until morning but not to wait until later in the day when the business would actually have some real money.

The four men were caught, but never accused, never arraigned, never tried, never forced to repay what they stole from me, never required to help with my medical bills, and they sure as hell didn‘t pay my mortgage.

In addition, they were never brought to civil court and ordered to pay damages to this guy because he's a nice guy and decided not to press charges. Psst, Rob! In order to get damages, you have to sue them. Also, this case is an attorney's wet dream. Even Lionel Hutz could sleepwalk through such a case. About the only way that I could see you losing such a case would be to hire the auto expert from the car wax infomercials who sets fire to the hoods of cars and who is also a master chef in the cookware infomercials.



Above: I cannot guarantee that he would win your case.

But I tried to keep my little business afloat, to pay the bills for my very young family. I ended up with thousands of dollars in medical bills, thousands more in bills from the business, I could not pay back. We lost our home, we lost automobiles, we lost everything but our family, and our dignity, because

because you didn't know that lawyers (and especially personal injury lawyers) don't need retainers and often work on a contingency basis?

because I eventually repaid everybody.

Oh! So close.

But the cowards got off scot free.

because Rob refused to sue them.

NO, HOLDER, THE COWARD IS YOU.

The tiniest penis of all is hard! And big! Well, OK. Maybe not big, but certainly hard! Rob suffers from feelings of inadequacy, and he will use everything he can to convince you that his is not the tiniest penis of all!

All of you have been made aware that there is a huge issue with Soetoro’s legitimacy to hold the office of President.

He's got a point. I mean, Soetoro can't be president. I hear there's some other guy named Barack Hussein Obama that they got to do the job.

The cowardice that comes from the too many millions of people who do not have the intestinal fortitude to pay attention in school, work hard, do the right things in life, get a job, any job, stand up for themselves, and start their lives with heads held high; instead they blame drugs, alcohol

Rob, Rob! Yoo-hoo! You're kinda getting off the topic, such as it was. Do you have a point, or at the very least, a theme? This diatribe, it's going to be shorter than the speech from Atlas Shrugged, right? Please?

and a vile, contemptible, loathsome system which has been gone for over a hundred and forty years.

Ah! You do have a theme. Let me see if I have this right.

Holder is a coward. Holder is a coward because he did not pay attention in school. Attorney General Holder does not have a job. Holder also has not started his life with his head held high. Holder blames the fact that he doesn't have a job on the fact that he uses drugs and alcohol. He also blames this on the fact that his ancestors were slaves in the United States.

Do, um...do I have that right?

Millions of Americans of all colors do the right thing every day, but there are far too many who use the cowardice of ‘injustice’ to write off all their lack of self esteem.

If anything says lack of self-esteeem, it has to be the office of Attorney General.

Injustice? Sure, there are still injustices. Just remember, I received no ‘justice.’

Because you refused to sue the imaginary people who fake shot you to fake steal thousands of imaginary dollars from your phantom business.

TAKE YOUR COWARDICE AND SHOVE IT.

The littlest penis of all demands attention! Rob is mad and he will stand here looking petulant until the world grovels at his feet!

You can read the rest. It's really not worth it.

Is that a threat?

Keyes: Stop Obama or U.S. will cease to exist

OK, folks. He's got a doomsday device, and he's not afraid to use it!

10th Amendment treason

I've been more or less silent on this issue, since the 10th Amendment issue is something between the several states and the federal government, and I surely don't want to get involved in a debate between them. But a recent post has suggested that...well, see for yourself:

In respect to a situation in which, the man holding the office of President, and a majority of men holding the offices of Representatives and Senators in Congress, and a majority of men holding the offices of Justices of the Supreme Court should all league together in a conspiracy of usurpation and tyranny, they would be breaking the law, Dr. Viera justly pointed out that:

Under these circumstances, the Constitution would ex necessitate empower and require “the Militia of the several States” “to execute the Laws of the Union” against the conspirators and their henchmen and hangers-on,

Oh, goody. I do love me some armed revolution.

Make Conspiracies Fast!

Phil Berg is going Amway:

I hereby request all of obamacrimes.com supporters to

1. go to your computers;
2. send a message to everyone on ‘your address’ book to go to obamacrimes.com and read it;
3. ask everyone on ‘their address’ book to read and send on to everyone on their address book; and
4. if they can, make a contribution to obamacrimes.com [on our web site to donate online or mail in]. I am requesting donations of asking four [4] friends to contribute $15.00 each or donate $60.00 themselves

Sorry. Carry on.

Dirty bomb planned by slain Neo-Nazi applicant

I think that would fall under the category of treason, though I'm not sure where he thinks Obama was born.

(and no, he's not a Neo-Nazi. The FBI found an application to become a Neo-Nazi, so presumably he never sent one in.)